The FCC Just Erased a 57-Year-Old Reporting Rule While You Were Busy Voting

A regulatory document and broadcast microphone on a newsroom desk

By Dakota Jones
Desk: Political & Government, Public Policy & Regulatory

Here's your Election Day plot twist, and no, it's not about a candidate. While the entire country was arguing about ballots, the FCC quietly took a wrench to its own rulebook and deleted a broadcast workforce-reporting rule that has technically existed since 1969. Effective today, November 3, Section 73.3612 and every reference to it are gone from Parts 73 and 74 of the agency's rules. Five pages in the Federal Register. Happy voting.

Now, before you picture stations shredding filing cabinets at dawn, here's the punchline: broadcasters haven't actually filed these reports since 2001. When the FCC tried to revive the requirement in 2024, courts said hold on, and implementation sat deferred while the lawyers went at it. Nobody ever filed. Nothing changes at your local station tomorrow morning.

What changes is the paper trail, and the death of a public dataset that was never born. The FCC had planned to make station-level workforce information public. That planned collection is now dead on arrival. No dataset. No visibility. Nothing for you to look up.

What Happened: The FCC Removes Form 395-B’s Rule

The FCC’s Media Bureau adopted an order on October 1, 2026, removing Section 73.3612 and related references from Parts 73 and 74 of the agency’s rules. The deletion took effect upon publication in the Federal Register.

Section 73.3612 covered Form 395-B, an annual report requiring broadcasters to provide employee counts by race, ethnicity, gender and specified job categories. The rule was adopted in 1969. Collection was suspended in 2001.

Then, in February 2024, the FCC voted 3-2 to restart collection after more than two decades. The Commission planned to make station-level information publicly available. But the revival was challenged in court, and stations never actually resumed filing while implementation remained deferred during litigation.

Abstract workforce data displayed on a newsroom monitor, with panels fading to blank

In National Religious Broadcasters v. FCC, the Fifth Circuit held that “the FCC lacks statutory authority to require broadcasters to submit employment data under Form 395-B.” The court vacated the FCC’s 2024 order in 2025. That ruling, not a new filing deadline or a sudden change in station practice, is what led to today’s cleanup.

The Media Bureau's official line is that the rule “no longer has any operative effect.” Translation: it was a zombie. Legally dead, still sitting in the Code of Federal Regulations, haunting the shelves. The Bureau skipped notice and comment via the good-cause exception, which is regulator-speak for “we're not deciding anything new, the court already did.” Fair. The final rule is classified as non-major under the Congressional Review Act, meaning it's small enough that Congress doesn't get a veto. A five-page obituary for a rule that died in a Texas courtroom over a year ago.

Why It Matters: The Dataset That Will Never Exist

Let's be honest about what actually happened here, because the operational impact is roughly zero. Nobody was filing Form 395-B yesterday. Nobody will fail to file it today. This is a ghost being formally evicted.

The real cost is information, and this is the part journalists should care about. The FCC's 2024 plan would have created a public, station-by-station record of broadcast workforce makeup, by race, ethnicity, gender and job category. Imagine being able to look up any station in America and see who it employs. That dataset was the actual prize of the 2024 revival. The court killed the revival, and today's deletion buried the corpse. That public record will now never exist under Form 395-B.

So no, we will never know, at least not through this route, what the industry's workforce actually looks like at the station level. The one government vehicle for that visibility got thrown in the junkyard, and nothing has replaced it.

A broadcast camera in the foreground with a Washington, DC courthouse outside a newsroom window

That distinction matters if you cover media, assess industry employment or follow how public agencies gather and publish data. The rule’s removal does not erase historical information, and it does not tell us anything by itself about the makeup of any station’s workforce. It means the FCC’s planned renewed collection will not go forward on this legal basis.

The legal fight also involved more than one objection. The National Association of Broadcasters challenged station-by-station public disclosure, arguing it raised First and Fifth Amendment concerns. It also argued that the Communications Act’s relevant language addressed television, not radio. National Religious Broadcasters and the American Family Association challenged the requirement in court, objecting in part to the addition of a non-binary gender category. The Texas Association of Broadcasters also joined the challenge.

The Fifth Circuit resolved the case on statutory authority. It did not need to settle every constitutional argument to vacate the FCC’s 2024 action. The court’s conclusion was narrower, and consequential: the agency could not require the reports without authority from Congress.

For newsrooms and audiences, the central question is therefore not whether the rule vanished overnight after years of active filing. It did not. The question is what public information would have become available had the FCC’s revival survived judicial review. That dataset will not be created under Form 395-B.

For more coverage, visit LD3 Productions’ Political & Government news desk.

Verdict: The Court Struck It; the FCC Just Cleaned the Closet

Credit where it's due: this is how it's supposed to work. The Fifth Circuit struck down the FCC's 2024 revival in May 2025. The Media Bureau, rather than leaving a corpse in the rulebook, removed the rule and its leftover references. That's the system functioning. A court said no, and the agency eventually tidied up.

But let's not mist up about it. The 57-year-old framing deserves an asterisk the size of a cab door: the rule was adopted in 1969, yes, but collection has been suspended since 2001. Nobody filed for two decades. Nobody was going to. The “57-year-old rule” was more like a retirement-age rule that hadn't worked since the Bush administration.

The actual lesson is the one nobody in Washington enjoys hearing: an agency cannot treat a rule as operative after a court vacates the action that revived it. The FCC spent 2024 through mid-2025 defending a revival that never had legal legs, and the only thing that changed today is that the paperwork finally caught up to reality. The closet is cleaner. The dataset is still missing. And the industry-wide workforce visibility the FCC promised the public? Gone, and nothing is on the schedule to replace it.

Sleep tight, democracy. Tomorrow the rulebook has five fewer pages.

LD3 Productions camera crew silhouetted against an evening city skyline

FAQ

Do broadcasters have to file Form 395-B now?

No. Broadcasters were not filing during the litigation, and the FCC has removed the rule that would have required the reports.

Did the FCC eliminate all broadcaster employment obligations?

No. This action removes Section 73.3612 and related references. It is not a blanket repeal of other applicable FCC equal employment opportunity requirements.

Why does the 1969 date matter if collection stopped in 2001?

It marks when the reporting rule was originally adopted. It does not mean broadcasters continuously submitted these annual reports for 57 years.

What changed on November 3, 2026?

The rule was formally removed from the FCC’s regulations, effective upon Federal Register publication. The key change is the end of the rule's paper trail, not a new day-to-day filing change for stations. Also, it's Election Day, and you probably have better things to do than read the Federal Register. That's why we read it for you.

Sources